Archive for the ‘General’ Category

Christopher Nolan Writes For Women

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

I greatly enjoy the storytelling of filmmaker Christopher Nolan. I enjoy his needless plot twists, his bizarre, limited character motivations, and his tendency to have his characters repeat the same lines over and over again. I’m serious—Nolan has narrative blind spots, but they don’t bother me at all. I find them charming.

I recently saw Following, his first feature film. Following seems less like a Memento precursor and more like a weak imitator. All of the Nolan obsessions are there, but they don’t have any emotional impact at all.

Nolan also seems to have a “Boy’s Adventure” mentality; who needs girls when you’ve got Batman? Because of this, women don’t seem to get the best roles in a Nolan film. I’ve decided to catalog his major female roles. Let’s see if there’s a pattern.

Following
The blonde does some sort of pointless double-cross.
Memento
Guy Pearce’s wife is dead. This gives him purpose.
Carrie-Anne Moss does some sort of pointless double-cross.
Hey, Harriet Harris is in this movie! This is her least ironic role ever.
Insomnia
Hilary Swank is the only woman in this movie.
Batman Begins
Katie Holmes is the only woman in this movie.
The Prestige
Hugh Jackman’s wife is dead. This gives him purpose.
Christian Bale’s wife figures out the end of the movie before we do. She kills herself.
Scarlett Johansson does some sort of pointless double-cross.
The Dark Knight
Maggie Gyllenhaal is in this movie. Then she’s not.
There’s also a prima ballerina. She allows Aaron Eckhart to say lines that will be repeated at the end of the film.
Other women in Gotham City: A crooked cop, a judge, Gary Oldman’s hysterical wife, and a woman on the ferry who looks like Karen Allen. None of these people do anything important.

Nolan could do a lot worse by his female characters, and it isn’t like his male characters aren’t also narrative props. And it isn’t like my track record for the stage is much better. But it sure must be dispiriting to audition for a character that will either be stupid or be dead. Or both.

Alternate History Theatre

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

I saw this quote about The Subject Was Roses on Playbill, then had to double-check to see if it was part of the actual press materials:

“Set in 1946 during World War II, this is a timeless, important play with characters so rich and believable that your heart goes out to them, wishing they could break out of old family patterns. These are people we can all identify with. It makes for compelling theatre.”
- Michael Ritchie, Center Theatre Group Artistic Director

Wow, I thought it was only this century’s wars that were never-ending!

Or maybe they’re doing some sort of Harry Turtledove adaptation twist and the play now takes place in an alternate World War II. That’ll bring in the crowds!

The Grass is Always Greener

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

Two Playbill.com headlines:

  1. LOS ANGELES: Medea, with Annette Bening, Opens in California Sept. 23
  2. LONDON: National Theatre’s Mother Courage Starring Fiona Shaw

I’m sure the American production will be just fine*, but Playbill, do you really have to list both productions on your front page at once? I’d rather not know what I’m missing.

BONUS CAVEAT: I’m not sure.